Similarly, there are other missions where killing a civilian instantly causes game over. But it felt more like they inadvertently undercut the moral point they were previously trying to make in order to slightly vary the mission's opponents. Was Infinity Ward trying to make a point? That you, the good guys, can be the root of the problem? Maybe. It's just a perfunctory part of the mission, but neither your character nor anyone in your accompanying squad comments or seems to notice. The son shrieks and cries over her corpse. I'm with you, Call of Duty™.īut then at the beginning of the very next mission, when clearing out a house of terrorists one room at a time, you shoot and kill an aggressive mother who was using her son as a human shield. Deadly environments create deadly people. "Survive," he pleads with his last gasp of breath, "whatever it takes. You manage to kill said military man, only to find your dad on the verge of death. You run to your house with your dad, who is then shot up by a Russian military man. In one mission, you play as a child in a Middle Eastern city being gas bombed by Russian forces. One of the recurring themes, I think, is the ol' "violence begets violence" thing. There are times where it tries to make a point, but then immediately glosses over it or - worse - contradicts that point moments later. You find out who's behind both incidents, who they're working with and, ultimately, save the day.īut, after playing through the game, I'm still not completely sure what Modern Warfare is actually about. Bad guys got hold of Russian gas while related bad guys bombed London's Piccadilly Square. The goal: Avenge an explosive terrorist attack in the UK. In Modern Warfare you play sometimes as CIA officer Alex, other times as SAS Sergeant Kyle Garrick. But it all still feels completely and utterly pointless. The campaign is well-paced, with memorable set pieces and varied missions. In the end, despite being a sophisticated game, Modern Warfare's campaign encapsulates everything that makes it hard for me to be a dedicated gamer. I wondered what it would be like to play its story mode as an adult rather than an uncritical teenager. You know the drill.īut the Modern Warfare reboot piqued my interest. Commuting, cooking, washing, more commuting, folding. Now I'm a 27-year-old man who plays whatever he can when he's not subdued by the grind of life.
![call of duty®: modern warfare call of duty®: modern warfare](https://blog.activision.com/content/dam/atvi/activision/atvi-touchui/blog/callofduty/body/mw-launch-body-screens/MW-ANNOUNCE-01.jpg)
At the time, I was a 15-year-old gamer who played everything he could. The last single-player Call of Duty game I played was the original Modern Warfare. Some people love it, some hate it and others accept it for the quintessential casual shooter it is.
Call of duty®: modern warfare series#
But in 2019, games like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare seem determined to say as little as possible.Ĭall of Duty has been around since 2003, but it was 2007's Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare that turned the series into a money spinning annual event. Other mediums, like film or fiction, trip over themselves to comment on the broader impact of war and armed conflict. No, I say Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is frustrating because, in its single-player campaign, Infinity Ward has managed to craft a seven-hour story about a 2019 Middle Eastern military conflict without actually saying anything even slightly meaningful about the subject matter.
![call of duty®: modern warfare call of duty®: modern warfare](https://dotesports-media.nyc3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/03143313/cod34.jpg)
No problem with the online multiplayer, which is still fun despite being camper-friendly. I don't have an issue with the shooting or in-game movement, which are both crisp and sharp. Is it time for video games to take war more seriously?Ĭall of Duty: Modern Warfare, the new reboot released Oct.